Land Use Element - General Plan
 Let us know whether you believe the Seven Guiding Principles provide the balance we need for the city or you think another principle or more should be added. Tell us what opportunities you believe are most important for public participation. And, of course, feel free to make any comments you want us to know about. Log in or register to submit comments below.
Return to Land Use Element Page
Return to All Projects Accepting Public Comment Page
Overall Comments
| Name |
Date |
Comment |
| Prior Comments |
04-10-2009 |
Comments: Regarding #5, circulating w/o cars: Pasadena does pretty well considering I think the biking system was a retrofit, but lacks a good north south route.
Raymond and Marengo are candidates:
Raymond is great above the 210 in either direction, and getting to and riding on Marengo going south is OK, but going north is difficult because Marengo gets a lot of north bound traffic (after work, at least), and north of colorado it has little space for bikes. It gets very bad at the 210 where there are two lanes going right toward an onramp. I'm not sure it is even safe
Los Robles is marked as a bike route, but it really is too busy with too many parked cars to be safe.
My experience involves a commute between North Pasadena (~Los robles & Woodbury) and Alhambra (~Mission and Fremont).
If i have missed some good rout, please let me know!
Thanks,
Eric
01/12/2009 |
|
| Prior Comments |
03-27-2009 |
Discussing the seven principles, my husband and I think we might do well to add another principle, stated something like this:
Pasadena is a city where the diverse social and religious traditions of its people are respected.
Joyce Millikan
Date: 1/21/2009
|
|
|
|